Hi
> > > + temperature-sensors {
> > > + ltd {
> > > + status = "disabled";
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + rtd1 {
> > > + status = "okay";
> > > + type = <4> /* thermistor */;
> >
> > 'type' is a bit generic. We don't want the same property name to
> > possibly have multiple definitions.
> >
> How about sensor-type ?
In the datasheet this is called "mode". I called it "type" since it's
tempX_type in sysfs and I wanted to stay in sync with that.
> > If it is how you address an instance of something which seems to be
> > the case here, then 'reg' should be used.
> >
The reason I didn't do that is because you'd effectively have to
duplicate the ID in both the name (e.g. sensor@1) and the reg property
(e.g. reg = <1>). But maybe that's just what is is in device tree, I
can live with that.
However, we'd also have to find out whether the "local" sensor ("LTD")
would simply be #4, as it is in sysfs today. I'd also be ok with that
as it would keep sysfs and device tree "in sync" wrt. naming.
Thanks
Oskar.
