On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 11:04:14 +0100, Daniel Palmer <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add support for the SigmaStar GPIO interrupt controller, gpi, > that is present in SSD201 and SSD202D SoCs. > > This routes interrupts from many interrupts into a single > interrupt that is connected to the peripheral interrupt > controller. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer <daniel@xxxxxxxx> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 11 ++ > drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 2 + > drivers/irqchip/irq-ssd20xd-gpi.c | 211 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 225 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-ssd20xd-gpi.c > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 3004c0f735b6..487d5e62c287 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -2248,6 +2248,7 @@ F: arch/arm/boot/dts/mstar-* > F: arch/arm/mach-mstar/ > F: drivers/clk/mstar/ > F: drivers/gpio/gpio-msc313.c > +F: drivers/irqchip/irq-ssd20xd-gpi.c > F: drivers/watchdog/msc313e_wdt.c > F: include/dt-bindings/clock/mstar-* > F: include/dt-bindings/gpio/msc313-gpio.h > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig > index 4d5924e9f766..8786aed7f776 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig > @@ -582,6 +582,17 @@ config MST_IRQ > help > Support MStar Interrupt Controller. > > +config SSD20XD_GPI > + bool "SigmaStar SSD20xD GPIO Interrupt Controller" > + depends on ARCH_MSTARV7 || COMPILE_TEST > + default ARCH_MSTARV7 > + select IRQ_DOMAIN > + select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY > + select REGMAP > + help > + Support for the SigmaStar GPIO interrupt controller > + found in SSD201, SSD202D and others. > + > config WPCM450_AIC > bool "Nuvoton WPCM450 Advanced Interrupt Controller" > depends on ARCH_WPCM450 > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile > index f88cbf36a9d2..1a6c3dbd67a8 100644 > --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile > @@ -116,3 +116,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_REALTEK_RTL) += irq-realtek-rtl.o > obj-$(CONFIG_WPCM450_AIC) += irq-wpcm450-aic.o > obj-$(CONFIG_IRQ_IDT3243X) += irq-idt3243x.o > obj-$(CONFIG_APPLE_AIC) += irq-apple-aic.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_SSD20XD_GPI) += irq-ssd20xd-gpi.o > + > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ssd20xd-gpi.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ssd20xd-gpi.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..c34f41380717 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ssd20xd-gpi.c > @@ -0,0 +1,211 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Daniel Palmer <daniel@xxxxxxxxx> > + */ > + > +#include <linux/irq.h> > +#include <linux/irqchip.h> > +#include <linux/irqdomain.h> > +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h> > +#include <linux/of.h> > +#include <linux/of_address.h> > +#include <linux/of_irq.h> > +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> > +#include <linux/regmap.h> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h> > + > +#define NUM_IRQ 76 > +#define IRQS_PER_REG 16 > +#define STRIDE 4 > + > +#define REG_MASK 0x0 > +#define REG_ACK 0x28 > +#define REG_TYPE 0x40 > +#define REG_STATUS 0xc0 > + > +struct ssd20xd_gpi { > + struct regmap *regmap; > + struct irq_domain *domain; > +}; > + > +#define REG_OFFSET(_hwirq) ((hwirq >> 4) * STRIDE) > +#define BIT_OFFSET(_hwirq) (1 << (hwirq & 0xf)) > + > +static void ssd20xd_gpi_mask_irq(struct irq_data *data) > +{ > + irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(data); > + struct ssd20xd_gpi *gpi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data); > + int offset_reg = REG_OFFSET(hwirq); > + int offset_bit = BIT_OFFSET(hwirq); > + > + regmap_update_bits(gpi->regmap, REG_MASK + offset_reg, offset_bit, offset_bit); > +} > + > +static void ssd20xd_gpi_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *data) > +{ > + irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(data); > + struct ssd20xd_gpi *gpi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data); > + int offset_reg = REG_OFFSET(hwirq); > + int offset_bit = BIT_OFFSET(hwirq); > + > + regmap_update_bits(gpi->regmap, REG_MASK + offset_reg, offset_bit, 0); Is this regmap call atomic? When running this, you are holding a raw_spinlock already. From what I can see, this is unlikely to work correctly with the current state of regmap. > +} > + > +static void ssd20xd_gpi_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *data) > +{ > + struct ssd20xd_gpi *gpi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data); > + irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(data); > + int offset_reg = REG_OFFSET(hwirq); > + int offset_bit = BIT_OFFSET(hwirq); > + > + regmap_update_bits_base(gpi->regmap, REG_ACK + offset_reg, > + offset_bit, offset_bit, NULL, false, true); > +} > + > +static int ssd20xd_gpi_set_type_irq(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int flow_type) > +{ > + irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(data); > + struct ssd20xd_gpi *gpi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data); > + int offset_reg = REG_OFFSET(hwirq); > + int offset_bit = BIT_OFFSET(hwirq); > + > + switch (flow_type) { > + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING: > + regmap_update_bits(gpi->regmap, REG_TYPE + offset_reg, offset_bit, offset_bit); > + break; > + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING: > + regmap_update_bits(gpi->regmap, REG_TYPE + offset_reg, offset_bit, 0); > + break; > + default: > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static struct irq_chip ssd20xd_gpi_chip = { > + .name = "GPI", > + .irq_mask = ssd20xd_gpi_mask_irq, > + .irq_unmask = ssd20xd_gpi_unmask_irq, > + .irq_eoi = ssd20xd_gpi_irq_eoi, > + .irq_set_type = ssd20xd_gpi_set_type_irq, > +}; > + > +static int ssd20xd_gpi_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq, > + unsigned int nr_irqs, void *arg) > +{ > + struct ssd20xd_gpi *intc = domain->host_data; > + struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = arg; > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) > + irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq + i, fwspec->param[0] + i, > + &ssd20xd_gpi_chip, intc, handle_fasteoi_irq, NULL, NULL); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void ssd20xd_gpi_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq, > + unsigned int nr_irqs) > +{ > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) { > + struct irq_data *d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq + i); > + > + irq_set_handler(virq + i, NULL); > + irq_domain_reset_irq_data(d); > + } > +} > + > +static const struct irq_domain_ops ssd20xd_gpi_domain_ops = { > + .alloc = ssd20xd_gpi_domain_alloc, > + .free = ssd20xd_gpi_domain_free, > +}; > + > +static const struct regmap_config ssd20xd_gpi_regmap_config = { > + .reg_bits = 16, > + .val_bits = 16, > + .reg_stride = 4, > +}; > + > +static void ssd20x_gpi_chainedhandler(struct irq_desc *desc) > +{ > + struct ssd20xd_gpi *intc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc); > + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc); > + unsigned int irqbit, hwirq, virq, status; > + int i; > + > + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); > + > + for (i = 0; i < NUM_IRQ / IRQS_PER_REG; i++) { > + int offset_reg = STRIDE * i; > + int offset_irq = IRQS_PER_REG * i; > + > + regmap_read(intc->regmap, REG_STATUS + offset_reg, &status); Does this act as an ACK in the HW? > + > + while (status) { > + irqbit = __ffs(status); > + hwirq = offset_irq + irqbit; > + virq = irq_find_mapping(intc->domain, hwirq); > + if (virq) > + generic_handle_irq(virq); Please replace this with generic_handle_domain_irq(). > + status &= ~BIT(irqbit); > + } > + } > + > + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc); > +} > + > +static int __init ssd20xd_gpi_of_init(struct device_node *node, > + struct device_node *parent) > +{ > + struct ssd20xd_gpi *intc; > + void __iomem *base; > + int irq, ret; > + > + intc = kzalloc(sizeof(*intc), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!intc) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + base = of_iomap(node, 0); > + if (!base) { > + ret = -ENODEV; > + goto out_free; > + } > + > + intc->regmap = regmap_init_mmio(NULL, base, &ssd20xd_gpi_regmap_config); > + if (IS_ERR(intc->regmap)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(intc->regmap); > + goto out_unmap; > + } > + > + intc->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, NUM_IRQ, &ssd20xd_gpi_domain_ops, intc); > + if (!intc->domain) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto out_free_regmap; > + } > + > + irq = of_irq_get(node, 0); > + if (irq <= 0) { > + ret = irq; > + goto out_free_domain; > + } > + > + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq, ssd20x_gpi_chainedhandler, > + intc); > + > + return 0; > + > +out_free_domain: > + irq_domain_remove(intc->domain); > +out_free_regmap: > + regmap_exit(intc->regmap); > +out_unmap: > + iounmap(base); > +out_free: > + kfree(intc); > + return ret; > +} > + > +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(ssd20xd_gpi, "sstar,ssd20xd-gpi", ssd20xd_gpi_of_init); Is there any reason why this isn't a standard platform device? In general, irqchips that are not part of the root hierarchy shouldn't need this anymore. M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.