On Wed 08 Sep 08:29 PDT 2021, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 02:37:39PM +0530, skakit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > On 2021-09-07 23:46, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 04:11:07PM +0530, satya priya wrote:
> > > > Add pwm support for PM8350C pmic.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: satya priya <skakit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi | 6 ++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
> > > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
> > > > index e1b75ae..ecdae55 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
> > > > @@ -29,6 +29,12 @@
> > > > interrupt-controller;
> > > > #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > > > };
> > > > +
> > > > + pm8350c_pwm4: pwm {
> > >
> > > What does the '4' represent, an internal channel number? It should
> > > probably be omitted if the PM8350 only has a single output PWM
> > > port.
> > >
> >
> > pm8350c has four PWMs, but I think we can drop the '4' here.
>
> Why is only one PWM exposed if the PMIC has for of them? Why number 4
> and not one of the others?
The node should represent all 4 channels, which ones the board uses is
captured in how they are bound to other clients - or defines as LEDs by
additional child nodes.
Regards,
Bjorn
