Hi Ming, thanks for the patch. I'm doing a first pass review of the new APIs you are introducing. Le mardi 07 septembre 2021 à 17:49 +0800, Ming Qian a écrit : > In some decoing scenarios, application may queue a buffer > that only contains codec config data, and the driver needs to > know whether is it a frame or not. > So we add a buf flag to tell this case. > > Signed-off-by: Ming Qian <ming.qian@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Shijie Qin <shijie.qin@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Zhou Peng <eagle.zhou@xxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/buffer.rst | 7 +++++++ > include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/buffer.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/buffer.rst > index e991ba73d873..11013bcf8a41 100644 > --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/buffer.rst > +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/buffer.rst > @@ -607,6 +607,13 @@ Buffer Flags > the format. Any subsequent call to the > :ref:`VIDIOC_DQBUF <VIDIOC_QBUF>` ioctl will not block anymore, > but return an ``EPIPE`` error code. > + * .. _`V4L2-BUF-FLAG-CODECCONFIG`: > + > + - ``V4L2_BUF_FLAG_CODECCONFIG`` > + - 0x00200000 > + - The buffer only contains codec config data, eg. sps and pps. > + Applications can set this bit when ``type`` refers to an output > + stream, this flag is usually used by v4l2 decoder. Currently, the bottom line is that all decoders needs a frame or field accompanied with the headers (only Annex B. being defined and supported for now). Decoders can be more flexible (and some are). The documentation here is not clear enough, remember that we must not break compatibility. I think you have to clarify the intention. This flag exist in OMX and have been source of confusion and inter-operability since the start. - If this flag is entirely optional, and is just an optimization, then adding it this way is fine, but the documentation should be updated. - If this flag is required only when the header is split, then this flag need to be accompanied with a V4L2_BUF_CAP_SUPPORTS_SPLIT_CODECCONFIG (or similar name, shorter could be nice). This is so that userspace can detect if that feature is supported or not. - If having split codecconfig is strictly needed for your driver, then this flag is not the proper solution. The only solution I'd see for that, would be to use something else then V4L2_PIX_FMT_H264 so that existing userspace are not tricked into trying to use your driver the wrong way. I think such header could make sense with H264_NO_SC (though not super clear what this is exactly, it's not really used), or a clearer new format H264_AVCC/AVCC3 > * .. _`V4L2-BUF-FLAG-REQUEST-FD`: > > - ``V4L2_BUF_FLAG_REQUEST_FD`` > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h b/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h > index 167c0e40ec06..5bb0682b4a23 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h > @@ -1119,6 +1119,7 @@ static inline __u64 v4l2_timeval_to_ns(const struct timeval *tv) > #define V4L2_BUF_FLAG_TSTAMP_SRC_SOE 0x00010000 > /* mem2mem encoder/decoder */ > #define V4L2_BUF_FLAG_LAST 0x00100000 > +#define V4L2_BUF_FLAG_CODECCONFIG 0x00200000 > /* request_fd is valid */ > #define V4L2_BUF_FLAG_REQUEST_FD 0x00800000 >
