On 17:30-20210907, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 07.09.21 17:27, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 17:20-20210907, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 07.09.21 17:13, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >>> On 16:22-20210907, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> This ensures that the SD card will remain mmc0 across Basic and Advanced
> >>>> devices, also avoiding surprises for users coming from the downstream
> >>>> kernels.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dts | 5 +++++
> >>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dts
> >>>> index ec9617c13cdb..d1d5278e0b94 100644
> >>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dts
> >>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced.dts
> >>>> @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ / {
> >>>> compatible = "siemens,iot2050-advanced", "ti,am654";
> >>>> model = "SIMATIC IOT2050 Advanced";
> >>>>
> >>>> + aliases {
> >>>> + mmc0 = &sdhci1;
> >>>> + mmc1 = &sdhci0;
> >>>> + };
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Should we do this at SoC level?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Well, I wouldn't mind - but that would also impact your EVMs. For us,
> >> this is fine as we are coming from that ordering above with our
> >> downstream kernel/dts.
> >>
> >
> > I think it'd probably be a welcome change. overall we've standardized on
> > partuuid.
> >
>
> Yeah, it's more about "dd if=emmc.img of=/dev/mmcblk1 - damn, the wrong
> one again."
>
> Let me know what you prefer, and I'll update my patch.
Lets do it at SoC level. I will follow it up with a patch for other K3
SoCs as well.
Unless someone has a strong opinion on this approach - if so, speak up
with reasons.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
