On 07/31/2014 05:26 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 07/31/2014 02:18 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
>> Add DT node for edma0.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>> index b695548dbb4e..41ce4e8bf227 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>> @@ -150,6 +150,12 @@
>> };
>>
>> };
>> + edma0: edma@01c00000 {
>> + compatible = "ti,edma3";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x10000>;
>
> Why the mismatch between the unit-address part of the node name and the
> "reg" property?
For some reason the whole da850 uses offset from 0x01c00000 for the SoC IPs.
The nodes are under 'soc' and that has the ranges attribute.
I do not really like this either.
>
>> + interrupts = <11 13 12>;
>> + #dma-cells = <1>;
>> + };
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
--
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
