Hello Andreas,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Specification and existing device trees use vsys-l{1,2}-supply,
> not vsys_l{1,2}-supply. Fix the example to match the specification.
>
> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 21d2202158e9 ("mfd: tps65090: add DT support for tps65090")
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2 -> v3:
> * Added Fixes header
> * + regulator and mfd maintainers
>
> v1 -> v2:
> * More verbose commit message (requested by Mark Rutland)
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
> index 340980239ea9..ca69f5e3040c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
> @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ Example:
> infet5-supply = <&some_reg>;
> infet6-supply = <&some_reg>;
> infet7-supply = <&some_reg>;
> - vsys_l1-supply = <&some_reg>;
> - vsys_l2-supply = <&some_reg>;
> + vsys-l1-supply = <&some_reg>;
> + vsys-l2-supply = <&some_reg>;
>
True, these also matches the .supply_name used when registering the
LDO[1-2] regulators in the tps65090 driver. So clearly the example was
wrong while the property specification is correct.
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
