On Mon, 2021-08-30 at 10:34 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 28-08-21, 23:01, Hector Yuan wrote: > > From: "Hector.Yuan" <hector.yuan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Add of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask function to group cpu > > to specific performance domain. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hector.Yuan <hector.yuan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 39 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h > > index 9fd7194..4916d70 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h > > +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h > > @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ > > #include <linux/completion.h> > > #include <linux/kobject.h> > > #include <linux/notifier.h> > > +#include <linux/of.h> > > +#include <linux/of_device.h> > > #include <linux/pm_qos.h> > > #include <linux/spinlock.h> > > #include <linux/sysfs.h> > > @@ -1036,6 +1038,43 @@ void arch_set_freq_scale(const struct > > cpumask *cpus, > > } > > #endif > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ > > +static inline int of_perf_domain_get_sharing_cpumask(int index, > > const char *list_name, > > + const char > > *cell_name, > > + struct cpumask > > *cpumask) > > What happened with the discussion we had about returning index and > passing CPU > there ? > Hi, Viresh, sorry for this, I didn't upload the correct version of cpufreq.h. Should I just go v15 or you want to do some review for other part of my patches? Thanks.
