Hi, On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Can you explain what is rationale behind this change ? Is it related to > suspend/resume ordering ? I had forgotten, but now remember the reason why I did this. If you see the current implementation of clk-exynos5410, you will notice it heavily depends on the clock "fin_pll". On the other hand, this clock exists because in the current dtb (exynos5410-smdk5410.dts), there is a node fin_pll such as fin_pll: xxti { compatible = "fixed-clock"; clock-frequency = <24000000>; clock-output-names = "fin_pll"; #clock-cells = <0>; }; So far so good. But the real problem comes in when I check the rate of fin_pll to determine if I should install the rate table or not (and I really need this for my patch). More specifically if (_get_rate("fin_pll") == 24 * MHZ) { exynos5410_plls[apll].rate_table = apll_24mhz_tbl; exynos5410_plls[cpll].rate_table = cpll_24mhz_tbl; exynos5410_plls[kpll].rate_table = kpll_24mhz_tbl; exynos5410_plls[dpll].rate_table = dpll_24mhz_tbl; exynos5410_plls[epll].rate_table = epll_24mhz_tbl; exynos5410_plls[ipll].rate_table = ipll_24mhz_tbl; } I *have* to determine if the rate of fin_pll is 24MHz, and this is impossible to do if fin_pll is not available. Moreover, there is no way I can ensure that the fixed clock provider for fin_pll was initialized before mine, so there is chance that _get_rate won't work. The only way I fix that is to set the dependency explicitly in the dtb, by adding the fin_pll clock as required resource. clock: clock-controller@10010000 { compatible = "samsung,exynos5410-clock"; reg = <0x10010000 0x30000>; #clock-cells = <1>; /* Add the parent clock */ clocks = <&fin_pll>; clock-names = "fin_pll"; }; But in any case, the bindings with the DTB must be changed one way or another, because I *really* need to use fin_pll on my driver registration. If you agree with this alternative solution I previously described, I can change that in the next version of the patch series. Best regards, Humberto > Obviously it breaks the kernel/dtb compatibility. We should be moving > in opposite direction, i.e. completely remove the custom samsung fixed > rate clocks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html