On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 6:03 AM Sa, Nuno <Nuno.Sa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > I'm preparing a patch to do a slight improvement in [1] where if there are no channels > given in the devicetree, it does not really make sense to probe the device. Now, > I want to express this in the bindings doc [2] but I'm failing to find a way to say that > at least one of the patternProperties channel has to be present. For my shame, > this is the only way I could express it: No shame, there's actually not a better way. What you need is something like this[1], but you'll see it has been an open issue for some time. I don't think it's worth adding given the verbosity. Rob [1] https://github.com/json-schema-org/json-schema-vocabularies/issues/16
