On 18/08/2021 16:31, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 3:32 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 16/08/2021 09:53, Lukasz Luba wrote: >>> Hi Krzysztof, >>> >>> On 8/13/21 1:54 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> Convert Samsung Exynos5422 SoC frequency and voltage scaling for >>>> Dynamic Memory Controller to DT schema format using json-schema. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> .../memory-controllers/exynos5422-dmc.txt | 84 ----------- >>>> .../samsung,exynos5422-dmc.yaml | 137 ++++++++++++++++++ >>>> MAINTAINERS | 2 +- >>> >>> I'm not an expert in this DT scripts and why it complains. Maybe it >>> complains because the "samsung,exynos-ppmu" is defined in the .txt >>> file... (?) >>> Although, in general looks OK. >>> >>> Acked-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx> >> >> I think the warning (triggered by DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m) can be ignored >> because it complains about compatible in example which is not present in >> the bindings. Usually it means someone wrote example not matching the >> bindings (e.g. a typo in compatible) but here it is on purpose. > > Ultimately, it will mean the binding is undocumented (or a typo). But > right now, it means the binding is undocumented with a schema. It's > off by default because there's still about 80 warnings. It's turned on > for the bot so we don't add more. So please don't ignore it. > By "Ignore" I meant here that it is a false positive, so it can be ignored. The warning is about compatible "samsung,exynos-ppmu" used in the example. However this exynos-ppmu is not part of this bindings and is documented elsewhere: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/event/exynos-ppmu.txt Best regards, Krzysztof
