On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 05:46:16PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: > Hello Rob and NXP, > > On 05.08.21 08:54, Chester Lin wrote: > > Add bindings for S32G2's evaluation board (S32G-VNP-EVB) and reference > > design 2 board ( S32G-VNP-RDB2). > > > > Signed-off-by: Chester Lin <clin@xxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 7 +++++++ > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > index e2097011c4b0..3914aa09e503 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > @@ -983,6 +983,13 @@ properties: > > - const: solidrun,lx2160a-cex7 > > - const: fsl,lx2160a > > > > + - description: S32G2 based Boards > > + items: > > + - enum: > > + - fsl,s32g274a-evb > > + - fsl,s32g274a-rdb2 > > @Rob: Should for new boards the description: syntax be used also for > enums? Or just at SoC level, and for board enums still traditional # > comments? It's up to how the platform wants to do it. Rob
