On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:35:26AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:20:38AM +0200, Antoine Ténart wrote: > > How do you want me to send the series? There is two conflicts when > > applying to libata/for-3.17: > > - patch 4/8: it takes into account a patch not in libata/for-3.17 but > > added before rc7. It should be better to first merge rc7, otherwise > > some modifications won't make sense. > > - patch 6/8: "fsl,imx53-ahci" was removed from the documentation in > > libata/for-3.17 but not in rc7. Resolving the conflict is really > > simple. > > > > I think it's better to apply the whole thing after merging rc7 into > > libata/for-3.17, because it will only have a really simple conflict to > > resolve. > > > > Please tell me what do you prefer before I send the updated version. > > Hmmm... does pulling in libata/for-3.16-fixes into libata/for-3.17 > resolves the conflict? If so, please send the patch on top of the > merged branch. I wanna avoid pulling in -rc7 wholesale at this point. Works for me. I'll cook and send a series based on top of libata/for-3.16-fixes merged into libata/for-3.17. Antoine -- Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
