On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 9:59 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > The leds-pca955x driver currently assumes that the GPIO numberspace and > the pin numberspace are the same. This quickly falls apart with a > devicetree binding such as the following: (...) Honestly I do not understand this patch. It seems to implement a pin controller and using it in nonstandard ways. If something implements the pin controller driver API it should be used as such IMO, externally. This seems to be using it do relay calls to itself which seems complicated, just invent something locally in the driver in that case? No need to use pin control? Can you explain why this LED driver needs to implement a pin controller? Yours, Linus Walleij
