Hi Ezequiel, Am Mittwoch, dem 04.08.2021 um 11:30 -0300 schrieb Ezequiel Garcia: > Hi Peng, Lucas, > > On Wed, 5 May 2021 at 21:32, Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > V2: > > - Add R-b/A-b tag > > - Merge V1 patch 13 to V2 patch 6 > > - Drop V1 patch 15 > > - Merge V1 patch 16 to V2 patch 5 and add comments in patch 5 to explain > > details > > - Add explaination in patch 8 for "why the resets are not defined" > > > > This patchset is a pick up Lucas's gpcv2 work for i.MX8MM and several > > minor changes from me to make it could work with i.MX BLK-CTL driver. > > > > Thanks for Lucas's work and suggestion, Frieder Schrempf for collecting > > all the patches, Jacky Bai on help debug issues. > > > > Lucas Stach (12): > > soc: imx: gpcv2: move to more ideomatic error handling in probe > > soc: imx: gpcv2: move domain mapping to domain driver probe > > soc: imx: gpcv2: switch to clk_bulk_* API > > soc: imx: gpcv2: split power up and power down sequence control > > soc: imx: gpcv2: wait for ADB400 handshake > > soc: imx: gpcv2: add runtime PM support for power-domains > > soc: imx: gpcv2: allow domains without power-sequence control > > dt-bindings: imx: gpcv2: add support for optional resets > > soc: imx: gpcv2: add support for optional resets > > dt-bindings: power: add defines for i.MX8MM power domains > > soc: imx: gpcv2: add support for i.MX8MM power domains > > soc: imx: gpcv2: Add support for missing i.MX8MM VPU/DISPMIX power > > domains > > > > It's nice to see this finally moving forward! > > As you know, Hantro G2 support for i.MX8MQ (and i.MX8MP, i.MX8MM) is currently > blocked, as you have requested: > > https://lore.kernel.org/driverdev-devel/5aa5700b862234895a7a6eb251ca3c80fdc1a6d3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > So, I think we really need to include i.MX8MP and i.MX8MQ on this series. > It's been quite a while and we really need to have that. To be honest, > I fear that > if we merge this series as-is, MX8MP and MX8MP support will fall in > the oblivion, > and Hantro G2 VPU will remain unusable. > > We are planning to submit Hantro G2 VP9 support soon, and we've been testing > on various platforms, but it will also be blocked by lack of power-domains. > > In the future, please Cc the linux-media mailing list, as well as > Benjamin, Andrzej and myself, so we can follow this. Please take a look at [1], which is the current state of this work. I intend to add both i.MX8MQ and i.MX8MP support to the series now, as it seems that there have been no big objections to my approach over the last 2 weeks, where I was on vacation. ;) Regards, Lucas [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210716232916.3572966-14-l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#m43cbf6b8615b2a37ff2abb0346e7e7f6594976d1
