Hello Mark, thanks a lot for all your feedback. On 07/29/2014 07:18 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 06:28:57PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> >> But for load switches that don't define a voltage output, the parent >> supply voltage is used so the constraints should only be applied if >> they were defined for the child regulators. > > No, think about what you're doing here and why we're filtering out > unsettable voltages - this causes problems for consumers on regulators > that don't have any ability to vary voltages since they will now be able > to list voltages that they can't select. > Understood. Thanks for the explanation. > I would also expect any regulator where the supplied devices are able to > vary the voltage to explicitly provide a constraint even if the > implementation is done in a parent regulator. There may be constraints > on the child supply which aren't directly present on the parent supply > and can be ignored if the child supply is turned off. > Agreed, if I explicitly set the voltage constraints on the child supply then this patch is indeed not needed. Best regards, Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
