Actually not all.On Tue, Jul 27 2021 at 02:46:39 PM -0700, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Quoting Martin Botka (2021-06-29 03:26:23)diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.cindex 8200c26b968c..51458f740ba0 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c@@ -1059,6 +1059,61 @@ static const struct rpm_smd_clk_desc rpm_clk_sdm660 = {.num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm660_clks), }; +/* SM6125 */ +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(sm6125, bi_tcxo, bi_tcxo_ao,+ QCOM_SMD_RPM_MISC_CLK, 0, 19200000); +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, cnoc_clk, cnoc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 1); +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, bimc_clk, bimc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_MEM_CLK, 0);Can we use msm8916_bimc_clk?+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, snoc_clk, snoc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 2);+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(sm6125, qdss_clk, qdss_a_clk,+ QCOM_SMD_RPM_MISC_CLK, 1, 19200000); +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, ce1_clk, ce1_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_CE_CLK, 0);Can we use msm8992_ce1_clk?+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, ipa_clk, ipa_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_IPA_CLK, 0);Can we use msm8976_ipa_clk?+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, qup_clk, qup_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_QUP_CLK, 0); +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, mmnrt_clk, mmnrt_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_MMAXI_CLK, 0); +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, mmrt_clk, mmrt_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_MMAXI_CLK, 1);+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, snoc_periph_clk, snoc_periph_a_clk,+ QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 0);+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(sm6125, snoc_lpass_clk, snoc_lpass_a_clk,+ QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 5);+ +/* SMD_XO_BUFFER */ +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, ln_bb_clk1, ln_bb_clk1_a, 1);msm8916?
msm8916 one is not ln_.
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, ln_bb_clk2, ln_bb_clk2_a, 2);msm8916?
Same reason.
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, ln_bb_clk3, ln_bb_clk3_a, 3);sdm660?+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, rf_clk1, rf_clk1_a, 4);msm8916?+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(sm6125, rf_clk2, rf_clk2_a, 5);msm8916?+ +static struct clk_smd_rpm *sm6125_clks[] = { + [RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC] = &sm6125_bi_tcxo, + [RPM_SMD_XO_A_CLK_SRC] = &sm6125_bi_tcxo_ao, + [RPM_SMD_SNOC_CLK] = &sm6125_snoc_clk, + [RPM_SMD_SNOC_A_CLK] = &sm6125_snoc_a_clk, + [RPM_SMD_BIMC_CLK] = &sm6125_bimc_clk, + [RPM_SMD_BIMC_A_CLK] = &sm6125_bimc_a_clk, + [RPM_SMD_QDSS_CLK] = &sm6125_qdss_clk, + [RPM_SMD_QDSS_A_CLK] = &sm6125_qdss_a_clk, + [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK1] = &sm6125_rf_clk1, + [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK1_A] = &sm6125_rf_clk1_a, + [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK2] = &sm6125_rf_clk2, + [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK2_A] = &sm6125_rf_clk2_a, + [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK1] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk1, + [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK1_A] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk1_a, + [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK2] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk2, + [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK2_A] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk2_a, + [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK3] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk3, + [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK3_A] = &sm6125_ln_bb_clk3_a, + [RPM_SMD_CNOC_CLK] = &sm6125_cnoc_clk, + [RPM_SMD_CNOC_A_CLK] = &sm6125_cnoc_a_clk, + [RPM_SMD_CE1_CLK] = &sm6125_ce1_clk, + [RPM_SMD_CE1_A_CLK] = &sm6125_ce1_a_clk, +}; + +static const struct rpm_smd_clk_desc rpm_clk_sm6125 = { + .clks = sm6125_clks, + .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sm6125_clks), +}; + static const struct of_device_id rpm_smd_clk_match_table[] = {{ .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8916", .data = &rpm_clk_msm8916 }, { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8936", .data = &rpm_clk_msm8936 }, diff --git a/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h b/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.hindex f2645ec52520..b737d7e456e4 100644 --- a/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h +++ b/include/linux/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.h @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ struct qcom_smd_rpm; #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_NCPA 0x6170636E #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_NCPB 0x6270636E #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_OCMEM_PWR 0x706d636f +#define QCOM_SMD_RPM_QUP_CLK 0x00707571 #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_QPIC_CLK 0x63697071 #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPA 0x61706d73 #define QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPB 0x62706d73Two patches are adding this in different places.
