Hello Vamsi,
On 22-07-21, 14:09, quic_vamslank@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Vamsi Krishna Lanka <quic_vamslank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Can you please add the type of pll in patch title. Something like Add
LUCID_EVO pll
>
> Add a new PLL type for SDX65 SoC from Qualcomm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vamsi Krishna Lanka <quic_vamslank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.h | 4 +
> 2 files changed, 174 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
> index c6eb99169ddc..93c8917b7273 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> /*
> + * Copyright (c) 2021, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> * Copyright (c) 2015, 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> */
>
> @@ -126,6 +127,20 @@ const u8 clk_alpha_pll_regs[][PLL_OFF_MAX_REGS] = {
> [PLL_OFF_TEST_CTL_U] = 0x1c,
> [PLL_OFF_STATUS] = 0x2c,
> },
> + [CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_LUCID_EVO] = {
> + [PLL_OFF_OPMODE] = 0x04,
> + [PLL_OFF_STATUS] = 0x0c,
> + [PLL_OFF_L_VAL] = 0x10,
> + [PLL_OFF_ALPHA_VAL] = 0x14,
> + [PLL_OFF_USER_CTL] = 0x18,
> + [PLL_OFF_USER_CTL_U] = 0x1c,
> + [PLL_OFF_CONFIG_CTL] = 0x20,
> + [PLL_OFF_CONFIG_CTL_U] = 0x24,
> + [PLL_OFF_CONFIG_CTL_U1] = 0x28,
> + [PLL_OFF_TEST_CTL] = 0x2c,
> + [PLL_OFF_TEST_CTL_U] = 0x30,
> + [PLL_OFF_TEST_CTL_U1] = 0x34,
> + },
> };
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_alpha_pll_regs);
>
> @@ -155,12 +170,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_alpha_pll_regs);
>
> /* LUCID PLL specific settings and offsets */
> #define LUCID_PCAL_DONE BIT(27)
> +#define LUCID_EVO_PLL_L_VAL_MASK GENMASK(15, 0)
>
> /* LUCID 5LPE PLL specific settings and offsets */
> #define LUCID_5LPE_PCAL_DONE BIT(11)
> #define LUCID_5LPE_ALPHA_PLL_ACK_LATCH BIT(13)
> #define LUCID_5LPE_PLL_LATCH_INPUT BIT(14)
> #define LUCID_5LPE_ENABLE_VOTE_RUN BIT(21)
> +#define LUCID_EVO_ENABLE_VOTE_RUN BIT(25)
>
> #define pll_alpha_width(p) \
> ((PLL_ALPHA_VAL_U(p) - PLL_ALPHA_VAL(p) == 4) ? \
> @@ -1777,3 +1794,156 @@ const struct clk_ops clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_lucid_5lpe_ops = {
> .set_rate = clk_lucid_5lpe_pll_postdiv_set_rate,
> };
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_lucid_5lpe_ops);
> +
> +static int alpha_pll_lucid_evo_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct clk_alpha_pll *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll(hw);
Use a regmap ptr like we do for other functions here?
> + u32 val;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_read(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), &val);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* If in FSM mode, just vote for it */
> + if (val & LUCID_EVO_ENABLE_VOTE_RUN) {
> + ret = clk_enable_regmap(hw);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + return wait_for_pll_enable_lock(pll);
> + }
> +
> + /* Check if PLL is already enabled */
> + ret = trion_pll_is_enabled(pll, pll->clkr.regmap);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + else if (ret) {
> + pr_warn("%s PLL is already enabled\n",
> + clk_hw_get_name(&pll->clkr.hw));
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_MODE(pll),
> + PLL_RESET_N, PLL_RESET_N);
this and others should fit in a single line (with regmap ptr)
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Set operation mode to RUN */
> + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_OPMODE(pll), PLL_RUN);
> +
> + ret = wait_for_pll_enable_lock(pll);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Enable the PLL outputs */
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll),
> + PLL_OUT_MASK, PLL_OUT_MASK);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Enable the global PLL outputs */
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_MODE(pll),
> + PLL_OUTCTRL, PLL_OUTCTRL);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Ensure that the write above goes through before returning. */
> + mb();
why is this required?
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void alpha_pll_lucid_evo_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct clk_alpha_pll *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll(hw);
regmap here too
> + u32 val;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_read(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), &val);
> + if (ret)
> + return;
> +
> + /* If in FSM mode, just unvote it */
> + if (val & LUCID_EVO_ENABLE_VOTE_RUN) {
> + clk_disable_regmap(hw);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* Disable the global PLL output */
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_MODE(pll),
> + PLL_OUTCTRL, 0);
> + if (ret)
> + return;
> +
> + /* Disable the PLL outputs */
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll),
> + PLL_OUT_MASK, 0);
> + if (ret)
> + return;
> +
> + /* Place the PLL mode in STANDBY */
> + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_OPMODE(pll),
> + PLL_STANDBY);
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long alpha_pll_lucid_evo_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long parent_rate)
too long pls split to two lines!
> +{
> + struct clk_alpha_pll *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll(hw);
> + u32 l, frac;
> +
> + regmap_read(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_L_VAL(pll), &l);
> + l &= LUCID_EVO_PLL_L_VAL_MASK;
> + regmap_read(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_ALPHA_VAL(pll), &frac);
> +
> + return alpha_pll_calc_rate(parent_rate, l, frac, ALPHA_REG_16BIT_WIDTH);
> +}
looks like you should reuse clk_trion_pll_recalc_rate() instead...
> +
> +static int clk_lucid_evo_pll_postdiv_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + unsigned long rate, unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + struct clk_alpha_pll_postdiv *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll_postdiv(hw);
> + int i, val = 0, div, ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * If the PLL is in FSM mode, then treat set_rate callback as a
> + * no-operation.
> + */
> + ret = regmap_read(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), &val);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (val & LUCID_EVO_ENABLE_VOTE_RUN)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!pll->post_div_table) {
> + pr_err("Missing the post_div_table for the PLL\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + div = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)parent_rate, rate);
> + for (i = 0; i < pll->num_post_div; i++) {
> + if (pll->post_div_table[i].div == div) {
> + val = pll->post_div_table[i].val;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return regmap_update_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll),
> + (BIT(pll->width) - 1) << pll->post_div_shift,
> + val << pll->post_div_shift);
> +}
clk_lucid_5lpe_pll_postdiv_set_rate() looks similar?
--
~Vinod
