Hi, On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 5:01 AM Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > qfprom devices on some SoCs need to vote on the performance state > of a power-domain, so add the power-domains optional property to the > bindings > > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml > index 861b205..a498a08 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml > @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ properties: > vcc-supply: > description: Our power supply. > > + power-domains: > + description: A phandle to a power domain node. > + I'm trying to channel my inner Rob here by saying that this description doesn't add anything and this should just be: power-domains: maxItems: 1 Here's an example of Rob saying this: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20210712151322.GA1931925@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Other than that, feel free to add my "Reviewed-by" tag. -Doug
