On 29-07-21, 07:13, Thara Gopinath wrote: > So the interrupt handler is a threaded handler. I moved it in v4 since one > of the "_opp" api has an underlying mutex and was causing issues. So using a > mutex should be pretty safe in this case. Ahh I see. > IIUC, the main change you are suggesting below is to include enable_irq() / > mod_delayed_work() under the spin_lock as well. Is that right ? In which > case isn't a mutex better than spinlock? Yeah, sure. -- viresh
