On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:02:49PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > Decoder input LVDS format is a property of the decoder chip or even > its strapping. Add DT property data-mapping the same way lvds-panel > does, to define the LVDS data mapping. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --- > V2: - Use allOf > - Move the data-mapping to endpoint > V3: - Rebase on V2 submitted a while ago, reinstate changelog > - Drop the allOf and un-rebase on previous pclk patch > --- > .../bindings/display/bridge/lvds-codec.yaml | 31 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lvds-codec.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lvds-codec.yaml > index 304a1367faaa7..f795c671c3ce1 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lvds-codec.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lvds-codec.yaml > @@ -60,6 +60,21 @@ properties: > For LVDS encoders, port 1 is the LVDS output > For LVDS decoders, port 1 is the parallel output > > + properties: > + endpoint: > + $ref: /schemas/media/video-interfaces.yaml# Adding this means the 'port' needs to reference '$defs/port-base' instead of 'properties/port'. Otherwise, it's going to start failing when 'unevaluatedProperties' gets implemented (appears to be soon now). > + unevaluatedProperties: false > + > + properties: > + data-mapping: > + enum: > + - jeida-18 > + - jeida-24 > + - vesa-24 > + description: | > + The color signals mapping order. See details in > + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml > + > required: > - port@0 > - port@1 > @@ -71,6 +86,22 @@ properties: > > power-supply: true > > +if: > + not: > + properties: > + compatible: > + contains: > + const: lvds-decoder > +then: > + properties: > + ports: > + properties: > + port@1: > + properties: > + endpoint: > + properties: > + data-mapping: false With this, I kind of think the schema should be split into encoder and decoder schemas. But we can leave that for the next addition... Rob