On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:21:53 +0200 Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The binding already allows specifying both interrupt pins, but there > is currently no way to describe a board where (for whatever reason) > only INT2 is connected. Make it possible to use "interrupt-names" > to make it explicit which interrupt pin is meant in the interrupts. > > Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/bosch,bma255.yaml | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/bosch,bma255.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/bosch,bma255.yaml > index 5b35856b1942..897a1d808ef5 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/bosch,bma255.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/bosch,bma255.yaml > @@ -49,6 +49,14 @@ properties: > the second (optional) interrupt listed must be the one connected to the > INT2 pin (if available). The type should be IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING. Looks like this comment needs updating to say the ordering is only true if interrupt-names is not present. Jonathan > > + interrupt-names: > + minItems: 1 > + maxItems: 2 > + items: > + enum: > + - INT1 > + - INT2 > + > mount-matrix: > description: an optional 3x3 mounting rotation matrix. > > @@ -73,6 +81,7 @@ examples: > vddio-supply = <&vddio>; > vdd-supply = <&vdd>; > interrupts = <57 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; > + interrupt-names = "INT1"; > }; > }; > - |
