On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 10:58 AM Alex Helms <alexander.helms.jy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 7/19/2021 3:48 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 11:20:00 -0700, Alex Helms wrote: > >> Renesas 8T49N241 has 4 outputs, 1 integral and 3 fractional dividers. > >> The 8T49N241 accepts up to two differential or single-ended input clocks > >> and a fundamental-mode crystal input. The internal PLL can lock to either > >> of the input reference clocks or to the crystal to behave as a frequency > >> synthesizer. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Alex Helms <alexander.helms.jy@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> .../bindings/clock/renesas,8t49n241.yaml | 190 ++++++++++++++++++ > >> MAINTAINERS | 6 + > >> 2 files changed, 196 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/renesas,8t49n241.yaml > >> > > > > > > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, > > there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream > > maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. > > > > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. > > > > Thank you for the info. I'm new to the kernel process and appreciate your advice. > > I felt uncomfortable adding your Reviewed-By tag but since there were no changes to the dt > portion of the patch, in retrospect I guess I should have added it. I'll keep this in mind > for the future. Is there anything I need to do for this patch? For v5, no. If there's a v6 posted, then add any tags. Rob
