Le 28 juil. 2014 à 10:49, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> On Sunday 27 July 2014 03:52:44 Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> Hi Benoit
Hi Arnd,
>>
>>> + i2c@11000 {
>>> + compatible = "marvell,mv78230-a0-i2c",
>>> + "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c";
>>
>> The point of my patches is that you don't need the
>> "marvell,mv78230-a0-i2c". It will work out at runtime if the SoC is A0
>> stepping and automatically enable the workaround. Please test with
>> only "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c";
>>
>
> It should still list both "marvell,mv78230-i2c" and "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c",
> as the generic name may not be enough to describe the register layout
> correctly.
I tend to disagree since the dts include the armada-xp.dtsi, which already declare
"i2c0: i2c@11000 {
compatible = "marvell,mv78230-i2c", "marvell,mv64xxx-i2c";
reg = <0x11000 0x100>;
};
"
I tested the dts on the device and it does inherits the i2c declaration, did I miss something here ?
Benoit
> Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
