Dear Benoit Masson, On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:48:10 -0700, Benoit Masson wrote: > + gpio-keys { > + compatible = "gpio-keys"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&power_button_pin &reset_button_pin > + &select_button_pin &scroll_button_pin>; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + > + power-button { > + label = "Power Button"; > + linux,code = <KEY_POWER>; > + gpios = <&gpio1 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > + }; > + > + reset-button { > + label = "Reset Button"; > + linux,code = <KEY_RESTART>; > + gpios = <&gpio1 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > + }; > + > + select-button { > + label = "Select Button"; > + linux,code = <BTN_SELECT>; > + gpios = <&gpio1 9 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > + }; > + > + scroll-button { > + label = "Scroll Button"; > + linux,code = <KEY_SCROLLDOWN>; > + gpios = <&gpio1 10 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; So you're using the GPIO_ACTIVE_<foo> defines here. > + }; > + }; > + > + spi3 { > + compatible = "spi-gpio"; > + status = "okay"; > + gpio-sck = <&gpio0 25 0>; > + gpio-mosi = <&gpio1 15 0>; /*gpio 47*/ > + cs-gpios = <&gpio0 27 0 >; But not here. Any reason? Also, nitpick: unneeded space in <&gpio0 27 0 > (i.e the space right before the closing >). > + num-chipselects = <1>; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + > + gpio2: gpio2@0 { > + compatible = "fairchild,74hc595"; > + gpio-controller; > + #gpio-cells = <2>; > + reg = <0>; > + registers-number = <2>; > + spi-max-frequency = <100000>; > + }; I'm not sure "gpio2" is a good name, as we might think of it as being the third GPIO controller internal to the SoC. Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html