On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:07:23AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 8:58 AM Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Will/Catalin,
> >
> > does this change looks good to you and could get an Acked-by?
> >
> > If so: would it be ok to land it through the USB tree with the
> > rest of the series? It seems a conflict would be relatively
> > unlikely.
>
> Officially I don't think you really need an Ack for most changes to
> this file. So says Will [1]:
>
> > although there are a few things I really care about
> > in defconfig (e.g. things like page size!), generally speaking we don't
> > need to Ack everything that changes in there.
Good to know, thanks!
> In case it helps, you can stick my Reviewed-by on there...
>
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks
I figured the next step is actually a rebase due to a conflict in
v5.14-rc1, commit 8ae030c34dce ("arm64: defconfig: Enable renesas
usb xhci pci host controller") made changes in the same area of
the config.
