Hi Yash, On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 5:57 AM Yash Shah <yash.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Add initial support for the SiFive FU540-C000 SoC. FU740-C000 is built > around the SiFIve U7 Core Complex and a TileLink interconnect. > > This file is expected to grow as more device drivers are added to the > kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Yash Shah <yash.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks for your patch, which became commit 57985788158a5a6b ("riscv: dts: add initial support for the SiFive FU740-C000 SoC"). > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu740-c000.dtsi > @@ -0,0 +1,293 @@ > + cpus { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + cpu0: cpu@0 { > + compatible = "sifive,bullet0", "riscv"; I'm wondering why you're using compatible = "sifive,bullet0", "riscv"; According to your own commit 75e6d7248efccc2b ("dt-bindings: riscv: Update DT binding docs to support SiFive FU740 SoC"), it should be compatible = "sifive,u74-mc", "riscv"; instead. Likewise, the older arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi is using compatible = "sifive,e51", "sifive,rocket0", "riscv"; and compatible = "sifive,u54-mc", "sifive,rocket0", "riscv"; but according to the DT bindings the rocket part should not be present. Is there any specific reason for that? Should the DT bindings and/or the DTS files be fixed? Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds