On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:18:01AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jun 2021, Emil Renner Berthing wrote: > > > The BeagleV Starlight v0.9 board[1] doesn't have the IRQB line routed to > > the SoC, but it is still useful to be able to reach the PMIC over I2C > > What is still useful? > > The GPIO and Regulator drivers? > > > for the other functionality it provides. > > > > [1] https://github.com/beagleboard/beaglev-starlight > > > > Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@xxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps65086.yaml | 3 --- > > drivers/mfd/tps65086.c | 21 ++++++++++--------- > > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps65086.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps65086.yaml > > index ba638bd10a58..4b629fcc0df9 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps65086.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps65086.yaml > > @@ -87,9 +87,6 @@ additionalProperties: false > > required: > > - compatible > > - reg > > - - interrupts > > - - interrupt-controller > > - - '#interrupt-cells' > > I can't say that I've been keeping up with the latest DT binding > changes, but shouldn't these lines be relocated into some kind of > optional listing? > > Or are optional properties omitted from documentation? Optional properties are the ones not listed in the 'required' list. Rob
