On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 03:36:36PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > [ Upstream commit e0cdd26af8eb9001689a4cde4f72c61c1c4b06be ] > > The pinfunc definitions used GPIO_A as function instead of GPIO_1_0 as > done for all the other pins with GPIO functionality. Fix for consistency. > > There are no mainline users that needs adaption. > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> I'm not convinced it's a good idea to take this patch for stable. in-tree users are unaffected and the only effect this can have on out-of-tree users is to break them. So the gain of having this is not positive. Am I missing something? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
