On Friday 25 July 2014 16:50:10 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > I toyed with the idea of adding the standard cache size specifications > to the L2C code, it sounds like there's a reason to do that now. > > Let's not mess around with adding stuff like the above to work around > the L2 code not parsing the appropriate specs from DT, let's do the > right thing and add bindings to allow DT to provide the cache geometry. Yes, please! That would actually reduce the realview to just the dma_zone_size definition, and I think someone also posted a patch to get that from DT recently. Having realview booting with an empty board file would be ideal. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
