+Lukasz,
On 09-07-21, 11:37, Thara Gopinath wrote:
> On 7/9/21 2:46 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 08-07-21, 08:06, Thara Gopinath wrote:
> > > static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > > {
> > > struct platform_device *pdev = cpufreq_get_driver_data();
> > > @@ -370,6 +480,10 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > > dev_warn(cpu_dev, "failed to enable boost: %d\n", ret);
> > > }
> > > + ret = qcom_cpufreq_hw_lmh_init(policy, index);
> >
> > You missed unregistering EM here (which is also missing from exit,
> > which you need to fix first in a separate patch).
>
> Hi!
>
> So how exactly do you do this? I checked other users of the api and I do not
> see any free.
Lukasz,
I don't see the cpufreq drivers ever calling dev_pm_opp_of_unregister_em(), and
even if they called, it would translate to em_dev_unregister_perf_domain(),
which has this:
if (_is_cpu_device(dev))
return;
I am not sure what's going on here, can you help ?
--
viresh
