On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 08:56:31AM +0000, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 09:56:55PM +0200, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 11:34:01PM +0000, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:50:43AM +0200, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot wrote:
> [...]
> > > > + otp@d8001ec {
> > > > + compatible = "nintendo,hollywood-otp";
> > > > + reg = <0x0d8001ec 0x8>;
> > >
> > > The OTP registers overlap with the previous node, control@d800100.
> > > Not sure what's the best way to structure the devicetree in this case,
> > > maybe something roughly like the following (untested, unverified):
> > [snip]
> >
> > I couldn’t get this to work, but additionally it looks like it should
> > start 0x100 earlier and contain pic1@d800030 and gpio@d8000c0, given
> > https://wiibrew.org/wiki/Hardware/Hollywood_Registers
> >
> > Would it make sense, for the time being, to reduce the size of this
> > control@d800100 device to the single register currently being used by
> > arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/wii.c (0xd800194, used to reboot the
> > system) and leave the refactor of restart + OTP + PIC + GPIO for a
> > future series?
>
> Makes sense to me!
There is no benefit to pretending there is a "control" bus (there is no
such thing), it only gets in the way.
Segher
