On 18 July 2014 09:47, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Before I apply anything in this area, I need a clear statement from the ARM >> people as a group on what the approach is going to be. @Rafael: The only patch which has blocked this set is: cpufreq: cpu0: Extend support beyond CPU0 This is about finding which CPUs share clock line.. Other patches are sort of independent of this one and cpufreq-cpu0 would continue to work for existing platforms if we apply these patches. I was wondering if you would like to apply other patches leaving this one? I will then rebase stuff again and send non-controversial patches for 3.17. So, that we get something in 3.17 and the last change can be merged during rc's as well once we finalize on bindings.. > Mike/Rob/Stephen: I believe Atleast three of you should express your views > now :) Any idea on how can we get some temporary solution for 3.17 as we didn't conclude anything yet on bindings ? -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
