Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2021-06-29 08:57:29)
> On Tue 29 Jun 08:36 CDT 2021, Shawn Guo wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 05:28:34PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Shawn Guo (2021-05-03 22:28:42)
> > > > Unlike MSM8916 which has only one APCS clock, MSM8939 gets three for
> > > > Cluster0 (little cores), Cluster1 (big cores) and CCI (Cache Coherent
> > > > Interconnect). Instead of hard coding APCS (and A53PLL) clock name,
> > > > retrieve the name from DT, so that multiple APCS clocks can be
> > > > registered.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/clk/qcom/a53-pll.c | 5 ++++-
> > > > drivers/clk/qcom/apcs-msm8916.c | 5 ++++-
> > > > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/a53-pll.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/a53-pll.c
> > > > index 8614b0b0e82c..964f5ab7d02f 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/a53-pll.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/a53-pll.c
> > > > @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ static int qcom_a53pll_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > struct clk_pll *pll;
> > > > void __iomem *base;
> > > > struct clk_init_data init = { };
> > > > + const char *clk_name = NULL;
> > > > int ret;
> > > >
> > > > pll = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pll), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > @@ -66,7 +67,9 @@ static int qcom_a53pll_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > pll->status_bit = 16;
> > > > pll->freq_tbl = a53pll_freq;
> > > >
> > > > - init.name = "a53pll";
> > > > + of_property_read_string(pdev->dev.of_node, "clock-output-names",
> > > > + &clk_name);
> > >
> > > Please no? Is there any use for this? Why not just generate the name as
> > > a53pll@<MMIO ADDRESS>?
> >
> > There is no other use for this than getting different names. I will do
> > what you suggest here. Thanks!
> >
>
> I have exactly the same problem with my two DP PHYs (in
> phy_dp_clks_register()), so I'm in favor of us setting some sort of
> standard for this (not for anyone to rely on, but to avoid everyone
> coming up with their own scheme).
>
> But unfortunately I don't have easy access to the phy block's base
> address in phy_dp_clks_register().
It really doesn't matter what name you use as it's basically only for
debugging. The problem is uniqueness. I've wondered if leaving the name
as NULL and then passing in a dev would be sufficient to generate a clk
name at runtime. Basically dev_name() plus an incrementing global
numberspace would probably work fine. Debugging would be annoying in
that case, but maybe it wouldn't matter.
