On Friday 11 Jun 2021 at 11:10:36 (-0600), Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 7:13 AM Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Since commit 86588296acbf ("fdt: Properly handle "no-map" field in the memory region"),
> > nomap memory is changed to call memblock_mark_nomap() instead of
> > memblock_remove(). But it only changed the reserved memory with fixed
> > addr and size case in early_init_dt_reserve_memory_arch(), not
> > including the dynamical allocation by size case in
> > early_init_dt_alloc_reserved_memory_arch().
> >
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Good practice is to Cc the people involved in referenced commits.
> Adding them now. This code is a minefield so I'd like other eyes on
> it.
Apologies for the delayed reply -- was away last week.
I've been starring at this for 15 minutes, and still can't see how it
could go wrong, so FWIW:
Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Quentin
> > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> > index 367f298a83b2..ebba88395bf8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> > @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static int __init early_init_dt_alloc_reserved_memory_arch(phys_addr_t size,
> >
> > *res_base = base;
> > if (nomap)
> > - return memblock_remove(base, size);
> > + return memblock_mark_nomap(base, size);
> >
> > return memblock_reserve(base, size);
> > }
> > @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ void __init fdt_init_reserved_mem(void)
> > pr_info("node %s compatible matching fail\n",
> > rmem->name);
> > if (nomap)
> > - memblock_add(rmem->base, rmem->size);
> > + memblock_clear_nomap(rmem->base, rmem->size);
> > else
> > memblock_free(rmem->base, rmem->size);
> > }
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
