Hi Jay, Am Freitag, 18. Juni 2021, 08:41:45 CEST schrieb jay.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx: > Hi Heiko > > -------------- > jay.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >Hi, > > > >Am Donnerstag, 13. Mai 2021, 08:46:06 CEST schrieb cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx: > >> From: Liang Chen <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> The clock property need 2 items on some rockchip chips. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >this patch should definitly move over to Jianquns gpio driver series, > >as it introduces the usage of these new clocks. > > > >Also while the single-clock variant definitly doesn't need it, > >I think we may want clock-names "apb_pclk", "debounce-ref" for the > >2-clock variants? > > > Okay, I think it's very good idea, > but is it possible to post the reg-name patch after these dts serial and gpio serial patches ? You're already creating a new binding when changing the max-items. So when we change that again later, in theory you'd need to support both cases (with and without clock-names) So I'd really prefer to get the binding right the first time and identifying multiple clocks by clock-names instead of an implicit ordering is way better in the long run as well. Heiko > > > > >Heiko > > > >> --- > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml | 5 ++++- > >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml > >> index d993e00..0d62c28 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml > >> @@ -22,7 +22,10 @@ properties: > >> maxItems: 1 > >> > >> clocks: > >> - maxItems: 1 > >> + minItems: 1 > >> + items: > >> + - description: APB interface clock source > >> + - description: GPIO debounce reference clock source > >> > >> gpio-controller: true > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
