Am Montag, 14. Juli 2014, 21:04:26 schrieb Beniamino Galvani:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 02:37:40PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 13. Juli 2014, 14:10:01 schrieb Beniamino Galvani:
> > > This adds a device tree node for the infrared receiver connected to a
> > > GPIO pin on the Radxa Rock.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Beniamino Galvani <b.galvani@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3188-radxarock.dts | 13 +++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3188-radxarock.dts
> > > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3188-radxarock.dts index 19d45b4..1d87bcb 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3188-radxarock.dts
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3188-radxarock.dts
> > > @@ -23,6 +23,13 @@
> > >
> > > reg = <0x60000000 0x80000000>;
> > >
> > > };
> > >
> > > + ir_recv: ir-receiver {
> > > + compatible = "gpio-ir-receiver";
> > > + gpios = <&gpio0 10 1>;
> > > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > + pinctrl-0 = <&ir_recv_pin>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> >
> > hmm, on second glance, I'm actually not sure if this shouldn't belong in
> > the soc subnode, like the gpio-keys and leds.
>
> (adding devicetree mailing list)
>
> I placed the IR receiver under the root node after looking at what
> other boards do, for example:
>
> imx6dl-hummingboard.dts
> imx6qdl-cubox-i.dtsi
> dove-cubox.dts
>
> On the other hand, if gpio-keys and leds are under the soc node
> probably it makes sense to follow the same rule also for the IR
> receiver.
your way was the right one actually ... using artificial subnodes is not
encouraged at all - see comments I received , so the soc node itself also may
go away.
I'll add the patch to my queue.
Heiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
