On 15-06-21, 14:10, Robin Gong wrote: > On 15/06/21 20:08 Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 15-06-21, 06:36, Robin Gong wrote: > > > On 15/06/21 14:08 Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 15-06-21, 01:55, Robin Gong wrote: > > > > > On 06/11/21 21:51 Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Without this series, SPI DMA does not work on i.MX8MM: > > > > > > > > > > > > [ 41.315984] spi_master spi1: I/O Error in DMA RX > > > > > > > > > > > > I applied your series and SPI DMA works now: > > > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Thanks Fabio. > > > > > Hello Vinod, Mark, > > > > > Is my patch set good enough to merge? I remember someone else are > > > > > requesting it from last year like Fabio. > > > > > > > > I have acked the last dmaengine patch, is there any else required from me? > > > > Which tree will be this merged thru? > > > Thanks Vinod, mainline is enough I think. > > > > I meant which subsystem tree will this go thru :) > I thought the patches with 'spi' tag could be merged into spi tree while > 'dmaengine' merged into dmaengine tree, the rest of dts patch merged > into i.mx branch. But from HW errata view, maybe merging all into i.mx > branch is a better way? Are there any dependecies between patches? If not all can merge thru respective subsystem. You already have the ack, so I dont mind if you pick thru imx tree -- ~Vinod
