On 11/06/2021 21:24, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 12:27:14AM +0100, Matthew Hagan wrote: >> Add Makefile entries for the Meraki MX64/MX65 series devices. >> >> Signed-off-by: Matthew Hagan <mnhagan88@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 6 ++++++ >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile >> index f8f09c5066e7..033d9604db60 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile >> @@ -154,6 +154,12 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM_NSP) += \ >> bcm958525xmc.dtb \ >> bcm958622hr.dtb \ >> bcm958623hr.dtb \ >> + bcm958625-meraki-mx64.dtb \ >> + bcm958625-meraki-mx64-a0.dtb \ >> + bcm958625-meraki-mx64w.dtb \ >> + bcm958625-meraki-mx64w-a0.dtb \ >> + bcm958625-meraki-mx65.dtb \ >> + bcm958625-meraki-mx65w.dtb \ >> bcm958625hr.dtb \ >> bcm988312hr.dtb \ >> bcm958625k.dtb >> -- >> 2.26.3 >> > It is odd to add the device trees to the Makefile in a separate patch > compared to their actual introduction. Does the tree even compile at > this stage? Will rectify this. Thanks!
