On 08/06/2021 14:59, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 12:31:55PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:+static int wcd938x_rx_hph_mode_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, + struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol) +{ + struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol); + struct wcd938x_priv *wcd938x = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component); + + wcd938x->hph_mode = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]; + + return 0; +}_put() should return true if it made a change, the same bug is present in a lot of other drivers too.
Sure will fix this in next spin
+static const struct snd_kcontrol_new wcd9380_snd_controls[] = { + SOC_ENUM_EXT("RX HPH Mode", rx_hph_mode_mux_enum_wcd9380, + wcd938x_rx_hph_mode_get, wcd938x_rx_hph_mode_put), + SOC_ENUM_EXT("TX0 MODE", tx_mode_mux_enum_wcd9380[0], + wcd938x_tx_mode_get, wcd938x_tx_mode_put), + SOC_ENUM_EXT("TX1 MODE", tx_mode_mux_enum_wcd9380[1], + wcd938x_tx_mode_get, wcd938x_tx_mode_put), + SOC_ENUM_EXT("TX2 MODE", tx_mode_mux_enum_wcd9380[2], + wcd938x_tx_mode_get, wcd938x_tx_mode_put), + SOC_ENUM_EXT("TX3 MODE", tx_mode_mux_enum_wcd9380[3], + wcd938x_tx_mode_get, wcd938x_tx_mode_put), +};Please don't use this pattern of indexing into arrays by absolute number, it's error prone and hard to read. Just declare static variables for the enums and reference them individually.
I agree, will clean these instances in next version. --srini
