On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 12:40:43AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Bartosz Dudziak (2021-05-02 05:20:27)
> > Add rmp smd clocks, PMIC and bus clocks which are required on MSM8226
> > for clients to vote on.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Dudziak <bartosz.dudziak@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> > index 0e1dfa8948..bf73942e86 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> > @@ -406,6 +406,79 @@ static const struct clk_ops clk_smd_rpm_branch_ops = {
> > .unprepare = clk_smd_rpm_unprepare,
> > };
> >
> > +/* msm8226 */
>
> This doesn't apply anymore. Can you resend just this one patch please?
> And base it on clk-next which I will push out shortly. Ideally a bunch
> of clks can be reused instead of redefined.
>
> > +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8226, pnoc_clk, pnoc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 0);
> > +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8226, snoc_clk, snoc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 1);
I have send v2 of this one patch. I have reused the clocks from MSM8974 because
after the change my code happened to be the exacly same as msm8974_clks struct.
