On 07/18/2014 12:47 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Am Freitag, 18. Juli 2014, 11:46:51 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
On 07/07/2014 05:13 PM, Matthias Brugger wrote:
This adds a generic devicetree board file and a dtsi for boards
based on MT6589 SoCs from Mediatek.
Apart from the generic parts (gic, clocks) the only component
currently supported are the timers.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx>
--
I will take this patchset through my tree but this patch touches an area
I am not handling.
Olof, Arnd, do you mind to ack this patch ?
wouldn't it be easier to just take patches 1,2,3,4 through your tree and let
patches 5,6,7 go through arm-soc?
There is no compile-time dependency between the two parts, so they will come
together nicely in linux-next and during the merge-window.
Also in [0] Olof wrote:
----------
Traditionally we usually take the DT changes through arm-soc, but as
long as we share the branch we might be ok. We tend to stick them in
different branches in our tree though, so rockchip will be a little
mis-sorted this release. Not a big deal, and we can deal with it.
-----------
So I'd assume splitting the patchset this way might be a nice solution?
Heiko
[0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg347053.html
Indeed.
Olof, Arnd ? Will you take the patches 5-6-7 ?
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
