Hi Greg,
Thanks for providing the review comments.
Please find my response inline.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2021 2:19 PM
> To: Nava kishore Manne <navam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; Michal Simek <michals@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> mdf@xxxxxxxxxx; trix@xxxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx; Rajan Vaja
> <RAJANV@xxxxxxxxxx>; Amit Sunil Dhamne <amitsuni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> Tejas Patel <tejasp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; zou_wei@xxxxxxxxxx; Sai Krishna
> Potthuri <lakshmis@xxxxxxxxxx>; Ravi Patel <RAVIPATE@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> iwamatsu@xxxxxxxxxxx; Jiaying Liang <jliang@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-fpga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; git <git@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> chinnikishore369@xxxxxxxxx; Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao
> <appanad@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] fpga: versal-fpga: Add versal fpga manager driver
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 01:39:54PM +0530, Nava kishore Manne wrote:
> > Add support for Xilinx Versal FPGA manager.
> >
> > PDI source type can be DDR, OCM, QSPI flash etc..
> > But driver allocates memory always from DDR, Since driver supports
> > only DDR source type.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Appana Durga Kedareswara rao
> > <appana.durga.rao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Nava kishore Manne <nava.manne@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes for v2:
> > -Updated the Fpga Mgr registrations call's
> > to 5.11
> > -Fixed some minor coding issues as suggested by
> > Moritz.
> > Changes for v3:
> > -Rewritten the Versal fpga Kconfig contents.
> > Changes for v4:
> > -Rebased the changes on linux-next.
> > No functional changes.
> > Changes for v5:
> > -None.
> > Changes for v6:
> > -None.
> >
> > drivers/fpga/Kconfig | 9 +++
> > drivers/fpga/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/fpga/versal-fpga.c | 117
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 127 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/versal-fpga.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig index
> > 33e15058d0dc..92c20b92357a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
> > @@ -234,4 +234,13 @@ config FPGA_MGR_ZYNQMP_FPGA
> > to configure the programmable logic(PL) through PS
> > on ZynqMP SoC.
> >
> > +config FPGA_MGR_VERSAL_FPGA
> > + tristate "Xilinx Versal FPGA"
> > + depends on ARCH_ZYNQMP || COMPILE_TEST
> > + help
> > + Select this option to enable FPGA manager driver support for
> > + Xilinx Versal SoC. This driver uses the firmware interface to
> > + configure the programmable logic(PL).
> > +
> > + To compile this as a module, choose M here.
> > endif # FPGA
> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Makefile b/drivers/fpga/Makefile index
> > 18dc9885883a..0bff783d1b61 100644
> > --- a/drivers/fpga/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
> > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_TS73XX) +=
> ts73xx-fpga.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_XILINX_SPI) += xilinx-spi.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_ZYNQ_FPGA) += zynq-fpga.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_ZYNQMP_FPGA) += zynqmp-fpga.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_VERSAL_FPGA) += versal-fpga.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_ALTERA_PR_IP_CORE) += altera-pr-ip-core.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_ALTERA_PR_IP_CORE_PLAT) += altera-pr-ip-core-plat.o
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/versal-fpga.c b/drivers/fpga/versal-fpga.c
> > new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..5744e44f981d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/versal-fpga.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2019-2021 Xilinx, Inc.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> > +#include <linux/fpga/fpga-mgr.h>
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> > +#include <linux/string.h>
> > +#include <linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h>
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * struct versal_fpga_priv - Private data structure
> > + * @dev: Device data structure
> > + */
> > +struct versal_fpga_priv {
> > + struct device *dev;
> > +};
>
> Don't you have this pointer already? What device is this exactly and why
> does it differ from the structure it currently lives in?
>
Agree, this struct is not needed.
Will fix this issue in v7.
> > +
> > +static int versal_fpga_ops_write_init(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
> > + struct fpga_image_info *info,
> > + const char *buf, size_t size) {
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> If you don't need this, why include it?
>
Agree this empty API is not needed.
It's a limitation with the framework and this needs to fixed in the fpga_manager core.
Will address this generic issue in a different series.
> > +
> > +static int versal_fpga_ops_write(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
> > + const char *buf, size_t size)
> > +{
> > + struct versal_fpga_priv *priv;
> > + dma_addr_t dma_addr = 0;
> > + char *kbuf;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + priv = mgr->priv;
> > +
> > + kbuf = dma_alloc_coherent(priv->dev, size, &dma_addr,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!kbuf)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + memcpy(kbuf, buf, size);
> > +
> > + wmb(); /* ensure all writes are done before initiate FW call */
>
> What "writes"? The memcpy above? Are you _SURE_ that really is correct
> here? This feels wrong.
>
Will fix in v7.
> > +
> > + ret = zynqmp_pm_load_pdi(PDI_SRC_DDR, dma_addr);
>
> If this needs some sort of barrier, shouldn't it be in this call?
>
Will fix in v7.
> > +
> > + dma_free_coherent(priv->dev, size, kbuf, dma_addr);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int versal_fpga_ops_write_complete(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
> > + struct fpga_image_info *info)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> Again, why have it if it does nothing?
>
Same as above.
> > +
> > +static enum fpga_mgr_states versal_fpga_ops_state(struct fpga_manager
> > +*mgr) {
> > + return FPGA_MGR_STATE_UNKNOWN;
> > +}
>
> Again, is this needed? If so, then the fpga_manager core needs to be fixed
> up :)
>
Same as above.
> > +static const struct fpga_manager_ops versal_fpga_ops = {
> > + .state = versal_fpga_ops_state,
> > + .write_init = versal_fpga_ops_write_init,
> > + .write = versal_fpga_ops_write,
> > + .write_complete = versal_fpga_ops_write_complete, };
> > +
> > +static int versal_fpga_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + struct versal_fpga_priv *priv;
> > + struct fpga_manager *mgr;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!priv)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + priv->dev = dev;
>
> You save a pointer to a reference counted structure, without incrementing
> the reference count. What could go wrong? :)
>
> You are getting lucky here, but as stated above, why do you need this
> pointer?
>
Will fix in v7.
Regards,
Navakishore.
