On 30.5.2021 22.38, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 10:02 PM Mauri Sandberg <maukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 30.5.2021 21.09, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 7:16 PM Mauri Sandberg <maukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Is it a fix? Shall we add the Fixes tag?
In the v1 a build bot complained about .owner along these lines:
--- snip ----
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
cocci warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-mux-input.c:138:3-8: No need to set .owner here.
The core will do it.
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
--- snip ---
I removed the .owner attribute in v2 as requested but wasn't really sure
whether it was "appropriate"
to add the tag so I put it there anyhow. Technically, this does not fix
any previous commit.
For this kind of thing you may attribute the reporter(s) by mentioning
them in the comment lines / cover letter.
It's there in the patch version notes so the 'Reported-by' was
unnecessary. Should it be removed?
That is, is there a tool sitting somwhere that tries to match reports
and their fixes?
