On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:25 AM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 09:23:27AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, 26 May 2021 19:28:05 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > Now that the arm,scpi binding is converted to YAML format, the following > > > errors are seen when doing `make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check` > > > > > > > > > > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' > > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): > > > > yamllint warnings/errors: > > > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.example.dt.yaml:0:0: /example-1/soc/scpi: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['arm,scpi'] > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm,mhu.example.dt.yaml:0:0: /example-1/soc/scpi/power-domains-0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['arm,scpi-power-domains'] > > > > See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1484218 > > > > This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch > > series is generally the most recent rc1. > > > > If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above > > error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to > > date: > > > > pip3 install dtschema --upgrade > > > > Please check and re-submit. > > > > Just curious if this is built as past of the series as I am unable to hit > this issue. However I get this if I remove 5/8 which is adding the scpi > yaml schema. Am I missing something ? The automated check does try to apply series, but runs checks a patch at time and it resets the base if it gets an error on a patch. I think switching patch 5 and 6 order should fix things. Don't worry about that yet, I'll look at the rest of the series. Rob