On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 9:42 AM Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 19/05/21 4:58 am, Rob Herring wrote:
> > The ti,j721e-system-controller binding does not follow the standard mux
> > controller node name 'mux-controller' and the example is incomplete. Fix
> > these to avoid schema errors before the mux controller binding is
> > converted to schema.
> >
> > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx>
> > Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../mfd/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml | 19 +++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml
> > index 19fcf59fd2fe..272832e9f8f2 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,j721e-system-controller.yaml
> > @@ -43,12 +43,10 @@ properties:
> >
> > patternProperties:
> > # Optional children
> > - "^serdes-ln-ctrl@[0-9a-f]+$":
> > + "^mux-controller@[0-9a-f]+$":
> > type: object
> > - description: |
> > - This is the SERDES lane control mux. It should follow the bindings
> > - specified in
> > - Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mux/reg-mux.txt
> > + description:
> > + This is the SERDES lane control mux.
> >
> > required:
> > - compatible
> > @@ -68,9 +66,18 @@ examples:
> > #size-cells = <1>;
> > ranges;
> >
> > - serdes_ln_ctrl: serdes-ln-ctrl@4080 {
> > + serdes_ln_ctrl: mux-controller@4080 {
> > compatible = "mmio-mux";
> > reg = <0x00004080 0x50>;
>
> "mmio-mux" compatible doesn't define using "reg" property. But a system
> can have multiple mux-controllers which would require us to use
> mux-controller@0, mux-controller@1,..
It does now in patch 3 as part of the schema conversion. It's optional
as getting folks to use 'reg' for syscon child nodes is an uphill
battle.
Rob
>
> And IIRC if we have "@", 'reg' will be a required required property.
> Would it be an issue here?
>
> Thanks
> Kishon
