Hi Nishanth, On 17/05/21 7:35 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 14:00-20210517, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Hi Nishanth, >> >> On 13/05/21 7:31 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>> On 17:41-20210513, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>>> Hi Nishanth, >>>> >>>> On 13/05/21 12:21 am, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>>>> On 20:42-20210512, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>>>>> Rename the external refclk inputs to the SERDES from >>>>>> dummy_cmn_refclk/dummy_cmn_refclk1 to cmn_refclk/cmn_refclk1 >>>>>> respectively. Also move the external refclk DT nodes outside the >>>>>> cbass_main DT node. Since in j721e common processor board, only the >>>>>> cmn_refclk1 is connected to 100MHz clock, fix the clock frequency. >>>>>> >>>>>> Fixes: afd094ebe69f ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-main: Add WIZ and SERDES PHY nodes") >>>>> >>>>> Assume we want this part of 5.13 fixes? >>>> >>>> This doesn't fix any functionality. Okay for me to go in 5.14 along with >>>> the rest of the series. >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> .../dts/ti/k3-j721e-common-proc-board.dts | 4 ++ >>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-main.dtsi | 58 ++++++++++--------- >>>>>> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-common-proc-board.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-common-proc-board.dts >>>>>> index 60764366e22b..86f7ab511ee8 100644 >>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-common-proc-board.dts >>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-common-proc-board.dts >>>>>> @@ -635,6 +635,10 @@ >>>>>> status = "disabled"; >>>>>> }; >>>>>> >>>>>> +&cmn_refclk1 { >>>>>> + clock-frequency = <100000000>; >>>>>> +}; >>>>>> + >>>>>> &serdes0 { >>>>>> serdes0_pcie_link: link@0 { >>>>>> reg = <0>; >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-main.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-main.dtsi >>>>>> index c2aa45a3ac79..002a0c1520ee 100644 >>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-main.dtsi >>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-main.dtsi >>>>>> @@ -8,6 +8,20 @@ >>>>>> #include <dt-bindings/mux/mux.h> >>>>>> #include <dt-bindings/mux/ti-serdes.h> >>>>>> >>>>>> +/ { >>>>>> + cmn_refclk: cmn-refclk { >>>>>> + #clock-cells = <0>; >>>>>> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; >>>>>> + clock-frequency = <0>; >>>>>> + }; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + cmn_refclk1: cmn-refclk1 { >>>>> >>>>> Just curious: why cant we use the standard nodenames with clock? >>>> >>>> We can use standard names here. Is there any defined nodename for >>>> clocks? clk or clock? Don't see $nodename defined for clocks in >>>> dt-schema repository. >>> >>> Looking at the fixed-clock example, lets go with clock >> >> Since I have two clocks here adding clock@0 and clock@1 introduces the >> following error. >> /home/a0393678/repos/linux-wip/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-common-proc-board.dt.yaml: >> /: clock@0: 'anyOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: >> 'reg' is a required property >> 'ranges' is a required property >> >> The current "fixed-clock" binding doesn't allow adding "reg" property. >> We'll stick to non standard names? or do you think the binding has to be >> fixed? > > Look at other fixed-clock examples in other arm64 examples > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi#n147 > is a good one.. Binding is fine, IMHO. Ah Thanks. It only has to be prefixed with clock-. Thanks Kishon