Hi Ralf, On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 11:00 AM Ralf Schlatterbeck <rsc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:20:35AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > Now it warns in linux-next: > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/auxdisplay/hit,hd44780.example.dts:52.18-62.11: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-1/i2c@2000: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property > > [I'm the author of that patch] > Can someone point me to the documentation of how to check a single > example against the dt schemata? I think I had that figured out how to > run the dt-checks over the whole tree in january but didn't bother with > warnings since the whole devtree was riddled with warnings at the time. It's much better in v5.13-rc2. > Docs on how to quickly check for warnings/errors would help me a lot. My > naive usage of dt-validate on an example yields a traceback, I've opened > a report on github because I think that even with gross mis-usage the > tool shouldn't traceback... make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/auxdisplay/hit,hd44780.yaml That still runs some checks on all files, unless you apply https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20210309112148.2309116-1-geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx/ first Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
