Re: [PATCH 4/5] ARM: gemini: add device tree for edimax NS2502

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:55 AM LABBE Corentin <clabbe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Le Tue, May 18, 2021 at 01:46:20AM +0200, Linus Walleij a écrit :

> > Is the FIS broken since you hardcode the partitions?
> >
> > Doesn't this work:
> >
> > partitions {
> >     compatible = "redboot-fis";
> >     /* Eraseblock at 0x7e0000 */
> >     fis-index-block = <0xfc>;
> > };
> >
> > (Needs CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS)
>
> No it does not.
>
> physmap-flash 30000000.flash: no enabled pin control state
> physmap-flash 30000000.flash: no disabled pin control state
> physmap-flash 30000000.flash: initialized Gemini-specific physmap control
> physmap-flash 30000000.flash: physmap platform flash device: [mem 0x30000000-0x331fffff]
> 30000000.flash: Found 1 x16 devices at 0x0 in 16-bit bank. Manufacturer ID 0x000001 Chip ID 0x002201
> number of CFI chips: 1
> Searching for RedBoot partition table in 30000000.flash at offset 0x1fe0000
> No RedBoot partition table detected in 30000000.flash
> Searching for RedBoot partition table in 30000000.flash at offset 0x1fe0000
> No RedBoot partition table detected in 30000000.flash

Hm since it searches at 0x1fe0000 that's where it thinks the last
eraseblock is so the erase blocks are 0x20000 (128KB).

FIS at 0x7e0000 should be erase block
0x7e0000/0x20000 = 0x3f

Can you test fis-index-block = <0x3f> and see what happens?

Yours,
Linus Walleij




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux