On 18-05-21, 11:50, satya priya wrote:
> Add temp-alarm node for PM8350C pmic and also modify gpio
> node to add gpio ranges and "qcom,spmi-gpio" compatible.
These should be two patches explaining why things are done like that
>
> Signed-off-by: satya priya <skakit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in RESEND V4:
> - No Changes.
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
> index 2b9b75e..e1b75ae 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8350c.dtsi
> @@ -13,13 +13,43 @@
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
>
> + pm8350c_temp_alarm: temp-alarm@a00 {
> + compatible = "qcom,spmi-temp-alarm";
> + reg = <0xa00>;
> + interrupts = <0x2 0xa 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>;
> + #thermal-sensor-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> pm8350c_gpios: gpio@8800 {
> - compatible = "qcom,pm8350c-gpio";
> + compatible = "qcom,pm8350c-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio";
why is this changed?
> reg = <0x8800>;
> gpio-controller;
> + gpio-ranges = <&pm8350c_gpios 0 0 9>;
> #gpio-cells = <2>;
> interrupt-controller;
> #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> };
> };
> };
> +
> +&thermal_zones {
> + pm8350c_thermal: pm8350c-thermal {
> + polling-delay-passive = <100>;
> + polling-delay = <0>;
> + thermal-sensors = <&pm8350c_temp_alarm>;
> +
> + trips {
> + pm8350c_trip0: trip0 {
> + temperature = <95000>;
> + hysteresis = <0>;
> + type = "passive";
> + };
> +
> + pm8350c_crit: pm8350c-crit {
> + temperature = <115000>;
> + hysteresis = <0>;
> + type = "critical";
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +};
> --
> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
~Vinod
